Relationship agreements perform tend to mean the time period inside which amarriage should have chosen to take place
1. But really, in family history, all of us knowthat for every rule there is certainly an exception to this rule. A great vexing part ofgenealogy is the fact nobody most knows how to utilize this new exceptions orrules that have one definitive adjective such always, perhaps, most likely,most likely, an such like. It would be interesting in the event that truth be told there other advice ofjointures being made per year otherwise a couple once a known relationships time.
2. Could there be a keen extant dispensation towards the marriage out of ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who had been third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or fourth cousins, after taken off the fresh new fifth LordClifford? Who would restrict its relationship day.
Arthur
Allegedly, if an excellent dispensation was tried and you may supplied, it could havebeen by among the many after the, and may also appear in the newest correspondingregister publication, whether or not it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop regarding York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop from Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop away from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop out-of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. Whether your 10th Lord Venezuela dating webbplatser Clifford does get married in early 1487 [state January] andhas Elizabeth after because seasons, really does this new chronology perhaps not works?
John fingers?
E born in later 1487, Henry born when you look at the 1488/nine, Joan in the ,etc. filling in the newest labels of posting from . If (a) thechronology nevertheless really works; and (b) their matrimony part wasn’t lower; thenwe only have new 1505 pedigree from Henry VII’s which is during the oppositionto the conjecture one she are a legitimate child.
6. Concerning your 1505 pedigree: May be the Clifford daughters the fresh onlyknown Henry VII relationships excluded? Were there other people? Therefore,wouldn’t one to echo badly about this file due to the fact a resource?
Of contrasting You will find made from the c.1505 Henry VII Relations pedigreeswith this new 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s North pedigrees, that are
On c.1505 Relationships pedigrees, this new Clifford youngsters are not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but alternatively on the St. John pedigree. Once the I’mnot used to the latest St. John nearest and dearest, adopting the ‘s the advice asit appears from the c.1505 pedigree, due to the fact taken from brand new 1834 Coll. Greatest. etGen. post. The newest phrasing inside quotations is exactly because looks inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
“No. XII.”Of my Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, along with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out of Somerset had around three husbands.” Because of the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My Woman the brand new King’s Mother.” who had “This new Queen.” whohad “Prince “By “Sir Oliver Saint John, basic spouse.” she had step 3 daus & dos sons:
An effective. “Edith, wedded to Geoffrey Pole from Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married towards the Lady Margaret, dau. of theDuke regarding Clarence.” They’d: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married so you’re able to Ralph Verney, Esq.” They’d: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[another type of child, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He had four pupils:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who had “Five daughters and you may oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to Harry Lord Clifford.” They’d “Jane. Mabill.Henry, son and you will heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Age, wedded to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. from Lincolnshire.”B4. “An effective Nun of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, married so you can Sir Richard Frognall.” They had:C1. “Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and sistren.” Having issueindicated, yet not called.C2. “Elizabeth, wedded in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “Elizabeth, married first to the Lord Zouche; immediately following towards the LordScrope from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [of the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [by Scrope] ” Conyers.” Which have issueindicated but not titled.
Margaret Duchess out of Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, history husband.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. out of K. Edward IV.” andthey got “Age.”
